![]() “We just want to know if they are dead or alive,” Mohammed told the officer. On Saturday, outside one of the two mosques, 32-year-old Ash Mohammed pushed through police barricades in hopes of finding out what happened to his father and two brothers, whose cellphones rang unanswered. Tarrant has spent little time in Australia in the past four years and only had minor traffic infractions on his record. The concept of notoriety and online fame has become as important, if not more important, than the actual action such individuals carry out.Tarrant’s relatives in the Australian town of Grafton, in New South Wales, contacted police after learning of the shooting and were helping with the investigation, local authorities said. This, in turn, has created the very attention that the shooter expected and craved and which – let's be clear – makes it an absolute certainty that some other disturbed individual somewhere on the internet will be driven to act just as destructively in future. Traditional media outlets, reflecting the desire to capture attention and ad views, continued to pour gasoline on the fire, with some idiotic titles even embedding or linking to the shooting video on their websites.Īs we have seen countless times in the past few years, the ready availability of material and entrancing images led to the immediate abandonment of any effort to restrict what content was made available. Social networks then amplified the problem, with a torrent of information – and misinformation – around the shooting. To be clear: live video of people being murdered by a white nationalist was readily and easily available to view around the globe for hours after the event.Īn unedited and virtually unmoderated publishing platform, watched by billions and plastered with adverts, taken to its logical conclusion. ![]() Not only did it take an hour for Facebook to remove the livestreamed video, during which time nearly 250,000 people had viewed it, but copies of the video were taken and immediately posted by others on Facebook and YouTube, occasionally with small edits designed to bypass the company's inadequate filtering mechanisms. on our services?! Wow, we never would have guessed. What is going through the executives and engineers' minds? People, with unfettered free access to billions, streaming horrendous crimes and propaganda. Rather than invest heavily in checks and balances in their outrageously huge publishing platforms, they hired relatively small and ineffective groups of poorly paid contractors to moderate content, while taking home vast profits and issuing easy apologies and condolences after the damage is done. ![]() The greatest indicator of an abject failure on the part of social media companies – Facebook, Google's YouTube, and Twitter primarily – to properly police the content that they make billions of advertising dollars from annually, content such as the footage of the mass murder he recorded. The obscene rapidly loses its shock value when viewed repeatedly. It frequently adopted a jokey, self-aware tone that makes light of extremely serious and deeply offensive views and opinions – which is itself a manifestation of the failure by social media giants to impose effective content controls while allowing for rapid widespread anonymous posting. The document leaps from topic to topic, with the only apparent connection being that each was designed to offend. The manifesto is itself indicative of the broken online culture of nihilistic offensiveness, outrage, and scattergun ideologies that has grown up around social media and lapped up by subnormal losers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |